What ails Manipur is its long history as a defining strand of the Northeast’s political narrative, its complicated politics born of geography and demographics, and state failure in trouble. Last year, it was the denial of entry to NSCN (Isak-Muivah) leader T. Muivah that had led to the months-long blockade by the United Naga Council (UNC) and its associated outfits. This time, the Sadar Hills District Demand Committee began an “economic blockade” of NH 39 and NH 53 in end-July, demanding the creation of a Sadar Hills district. In retaliation, the UNC enforced a counter-blockade on the same roads, protesting against the state government’s alleged attempt to divide Naga-dominated areas for the new district. Thus the abject predicament of Imphal and other parts of Manipur, with nobody willing to budge and political negotiations clouded by the coming polls and the memory of ethnic clashes that claimed many lives in the 1990s.
Manipur’s plight is a failure of the authorities to assert control over the situation. Between a bitter interface with the institutions of state and the visible abdication by the state, why would Manipuris believe in government’s ability to care — to ensure essentials reach them, that their movement is not obstructed? The Centre needs to do much, much more than it has done so far to restore normalcy. And Manipur must be more than an emergency discourse in New Delhi, moving itself beyond the question of alternative feeder routes to encompass a fully fledged economic and political project.